|
Training > Skills Assessment
-
Online self assessment of AMA Guides
knowledge and skills
-
Superb learning experience
-
Obtain up to 4 hours of Category 1 AMA and
California QME Credits
-
Only $197 to thoroughly assess your skills
-
First step for those seeking the
Certified Impairment Rater® designation
If you perform, review or manage impairment
evaluation ratings, this self assessment is
essential. The assessment is open book and
requires you to use the AMA Guides;
therefore it is a very effective learning tool
and you will increase your abilities to apply
the Guides. After you respond to the
question you are given the correct answer and
references.
This is a dynamic assessment
consisting of 100 items, typically taking 4
hours to complete. Each question is based on a
random selection of questions from specific
areas of the Guides. Therefore, each examination
is different. The weighting is consistent with
the ratings performed. 15-25% of the items are
on the Principles of the Guides, 25-30% spine,
20-25% upper extremity, and the remaining 20-25%
lower extremity and other areas.
Successful completion of this
Comprehensive Skills Assessment meets the
examination component for the
Certified Impairment Rater® designation.
The examination items were written by
Christopher R. Brigham, MD, FACOEM, FAADEP,
CIME, an experienced expert on the AMA Guides
and the Founder of the American Board of
Independent Medical Examiners.
Objectives
Participants should be able to
demonstrate:
- An understanding of key
terms and concepts in impairment evaluation.
- The ability to assess
permanent impairment of musculoskeletal
injuries, including those of the spine,
upper extremities and lower extremities.
- The ability to assess
permanent impairment of nervous system
disorders and pain.
Comprehensive Skills
Assessment - Only $197

Group discount
for 25 or more examinees -
Contact Us for details
Faculty Disclosure
This examination was developed by Dr. Brigham,
who is a stockholder of Brigham and Associates,
Inc. and receives royalties from the American
Medical Association.
Continuing Medical Education
This activity has been planned
and implemented in accordance with the Essential
Areas and Policies of the Accreditation Council
for Continuing Medical Education through the
Joint Sponsorship of the American College of
Occupational and Environmental Medicine and
Brigham and Associates. The American College of
Occupational and Environmental Medicine is
accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing
medical education for physicians.

The American
College of Occupational and Environmental
Medicine designates this educational activity
for a maximum of 4.0 AMA PRA Category 1
Credit(s)TM.
Physicians should only claim credit commensurate
with the extent of their participation in the
activity.
Additionally, this activity is approved by the
State of California Division of Workers’
Compensation for up to 4 Qualified Medical
Examiner (QME) credits for reappointment.
Content
The weighting of the examination items are based
on the distribution of required knowledge and
skills to perform ratings typically encountered
in the workers' compensation and liability
arenas. The examination focuses on essential
principles and musculoskeletal case exercises,
demonstrating actual skills in using the Guides.
|
Content |
Chapter(s) |
Weighting |
|
Principles |
1
and 2 |
15% |
| Spine |
15 |
30% |
| Upper
Extremities |
16 |
20% |
| Lower
Extremities |
17 |
15% |
|
Nervous System |
13 |
5% |
| Pain
and Other Chapters |
18 |
15% |
Example Questions
The following are
examples of questions. Why not test yourself, the
answers are provided by clicking on the link below.
1. Which ONE of the following situations
would not be rated using the Range-of-Motion (ROM)
method
A. Fracture at L1 and L2
B. Fusion L3 to L5
C. Fracture at T12 and L1
D. Recurrent radiculopathy
2. A patient had
electrodiagnostically confirmed carpal tunnel
syndrome and underwent a release. At the time of
maximal medical improvement, several months later,
she has minimal difficulties that for the most part
are forgotten during activity. Examination reveals
normal two point discrimination, however abnormal
sensibility (tested with monofilaments) over the
thumb only, the rest of the median nerve was intact.
Motor examination was intact. Grip strength was 20
kg. in the operated hand and 30 kg. in the opposite
hand. What is a probable rating?
A. 0% whole person permanent impairment
B. 3% whole person permanent impairment
C. 6% whole person permanent impairment
D. 12% whole person permanent impairment
3. Which of the following lower
extremity methods can be combined?
A. Muscle atrophy and diagnosis based estimate
B. Gait and range of motion
C. Range of motion and peripheral nerve injury
D. Muscle strength and arthritis
Click Here for Answers
View more educational products
Contact
Nicole LeDuc for more information or Call
207.879.9400 or 866.848.9205.
|